Why is there a conversation about whether or not a woman by law should have to wax a male’s genitals? Why is the obvious controversial these days? Are some activists willing to push their political agenda at the risk of hurting women? Founder of Feminist Current, Meghan Murphy joins Dan and Amy to discuss.

Related Content

Putting Family First

Has society been not only feminizing men, but also masculating women? Should parents be choosing their job over their children? Is missing most of your child's life in pursuit of a successful career worthwhile? Dan and Amy discuss the article, “America Needs a Family First Movement."

Related Content

Ostracizing Conservative Women

Why are conservative women left out of the conversation and shut out by the media? Why is there an expectation that women must vote for other women regardless of political ideology? Why doesn’t feminism encourage women to do what they want, whether it’s being a stay at home mom or being a working mom? Dan and Kristen McQuery discuss.

Related Content

Abortion Hurts Women

In addition to the physical problems caused by abortion, what are some of the psychological problems women go through after the procedure? Former abortion doctor, Kathi Aultman, joins Dan and Kristen McQueary to share her reaction to the movie "Unplanned" and her own conversion story to becoming a pro-life activist.

Related Content

The Abortion Capital Of America

Is there too broad of a definition of the “health of the mother” in abortion laws? Is there ever a reason to get a late term abortion to save the life of a woman? Former abortionist and OB/GYN, Dr. Anthony Levatino joins Dan and Amy to discuss the horrors of late term abortions and why he converted to becoming a pro-life advocate.

Related Content

Michael “She Hit Me First” Avenatti 2020

In the spirit of bipartisanship, should Trump pardon Michael Avenatti for all his crimes? Has feminism become mistakenly synonymous with a movement that is good for women? Does feminism simply reward women for their service to the state? Is Planned Parenthood already prepping for a post Roe v. Wade world? Screenwriter for the Gosnell movie, Andrew Klavan joins Dan and Amy to discuss.

Related Content

#MeToo Backfiring

Will #MeToo encourage more false allegations? If men are "toxic" then why shouldn't women be able to falsely accuse them since they're intrinsically bad? What about teaching your children about the presumption of innocence? Are women led to believe the pains of regret are equal to rape? Why are campuses obsessed with teaching students to see themselves as victims? Contributing editor at City Journal, Heather MacDonald joins Dan and Kristen McQueary to discuss. 

Related Content

The Logic Of The Anti-Choice Left


Many on the political left - who claim to support a woman's right to choose - are outraged over the recent SCOTUS decision in Janus v. AFSCME. The ruling gave women (and men) who work for the state the right to choose whether or not they associate with a labor union. So, what's the problem? Do Chicagoans Follow the Left's Logic? 


Identity Politics Destroying The Sciences

“The idea that females are living in a world of discrimination against them today is just preposterous.” Identity politics has already destroyed the humanities and social sciences but is STEM and our tech advantage in the world next? Manhattan Institute Senior fellow, Heather MacDonald joins Dan and Amy to explain how identity politics is harming the sciences.

Related Content

Empowering Young Girls In Chicago’s Most Violent Neighborhoods

Can Chicago's civic organizations reduce the violence where city policies have failed? Executive Director of "Girls in the Game," Meghan Morgan joins Dan and Amy to discuss the ways the organization empowers young girls to use their voice and gain the leadership skills to affect change in their communities.

Related Content

Demystification Of Gun Hysteria

Does the Illinois political ruling class showcase their lack of respect for voters by pledging to go after their guns? If women are more likely to be victims of crime, shouldn’t we empower them with the tools to defend themselves, including firearms? Owner of Ladies of Steel Gun Club on Chicago's South Side, Lynn Dunagan joins Dan and Shaun to discuss how her club educates and trains women on how to use firearms. Lynn says the club has grown from 30 to 95 ladies in less than a year.

Related Content 

Breakdown of Traditional Norms Leading To Societal Failures

Is the rest of the country’s decline in violent crime highlighting the failures of Tiny Dancer in Chicago? Is the problem not the presence of guns but the absence of fathers? Are feminists quick to blame the patriarchy for their problems rather than looking within their own sexual liberation movement? What will the lasting consequences be in personal and professional relationships for women as a result of the #MeToo movement? Contributing Editor at City Journal, Heather MacDonald joins Dan and Amy to discuss.

Related Content

The #1 Oppressor Of Free Press

Was Trump’s presidential victory such a surprise that the DOJ had to scramble together to cover their politicized tracks? Did Bannon believe Trump was the face of the Bannon movement? Are we living in two Americas, one that is real America and another imaginary America in the minds of the media and the Hollywood elite? “Only privileged women in Hollywood could feel oppressed making $5-10 million a movie, while women in Iran are risking their lives tearing off their veils.” Screenwriter and essayist, Andrew Klavan joins Dan and Amy to discuss.

Related Content

Paying More Taxes Because.... Charity!

Are the Trump tax cuts just a thinly veiled ruse to prop up the patriarchy, as Susan Faludi suggests? Or is this just the typical hysterics from the left? Do the lines outside Cook and Dupage counties’ assessor's’ offices disprove the liberal philosophy that taxes “don’t matter or affect people’s behaviors?” Can we make property taxes a charitable donation to the government in Illinois? Does Medicaid give states an incentive to waste money? Wall Street Journal Columnist, Senior Economist for CNN, and former Donald Trump advisor, Steve Moore joins Dan and Amy to discuss.

View full transcript

Proft: Dan and Amy, good morning. And Amy, we had the chance to have a little holiday lunch with Steve Moore...just before Christmas. Jacobson: Yeah, we sure did! Proft: That was nice. Jacobson: Well it took me a little longer to get there, I was supposed to be on time because I'm a punctual person but I had the wrong address emailed to me by Stephen Moore! I'm sure it was just an oversight. Proft: Yeah. Jacobson: So I got there when you guys had had your food delivered, but it was a nice event. Proft: It was, it was too...*Jacobson chuckles* no, what? It was to celebrate the passage of tax cuts, and what Steve Moore and other supply-side economist types think will be the result, which will be a strong economy in 2018, 4% GDP growth, and economic opportunities and job creation associated with that kind of growth. For more on the topic, and an opportunity to apologize publicly to you, Amy, we're pleased to be joined by Heritage Foundation economist Steve Moore. Steve, thanks for being with us, appreciate it. Moore: *laughing* Good morning, guys, Happy New Year. You know, one thing I learned from that lunch...you guys have faces for TV, not radio! You guys are just a good looking couple! Proft: Well, thank you so much, thank you very much. Jacobson: Well, you know, I really meant Amy... Proft: Ahh, well... Jacobson: Yeah, Dan! He just didn't want to discriminate against you. Moore: Yeah but thank you, it really meant a lot to me that you guys came... Proft: Yeah, it was great. Moore: And Amy, sorry that I sent you to the wrong place, my bad. I owe you a lunch. Proft: Yeah. Moore: Yeah but look you know, 2018 is off to a great start. We're pushing on with Dow 25,000, something that no one expected or thought was possible...got into an online argument with a bunch of these liberal economists who now say "Well, this is the Obama economy, it's not the Trump economy! It's Obama who drove the economy up to 25,000 on the Dow, and up to 3% GDP growth." That's kind of nonsensical because everything we've been doing under Trump has been basically been throwing Obama's policies into reverse. Proft: Yeah...that doesn't mean that the Left is not still advancing their case. And I'm going to give you an opportunity to restore your good name in the female community, Steve Moore, by agreeing with feminist Susan Faludi, who wrote about, over the holidays in the New York Times... Moore: Now, who is this again? Proft: Susan Faludi, Susan Faludi of...ya know...great feminists like Gloria Steinem and Naomi Wolf and others like that. Moore: Oh, okay. Got it. Proft: She suggests that what you and your friends did in DC, Steve, was to reinforce the patriarchy that oppresses women... Jacobson: *shaking head* It has NOTHING to do with gender...wow. Proft: ...that's what this plan does... Moore: How's that? Proft: Let me give you an example. "The Tax Cuts and Job Act systematically guts benefits that support women who need support the most. It means an end to the Personal and Dependent exemptions, a disaster for minimum wage workers, nearly 2/3 of whom are women," Steve. Moore: Well...no, I think she's confused about the numbers. So we basically dramatically increased the standard deduction, so let's say that you're a single, and you have no kids and you're not married. Your standard deduction goes up to about $12,000 from a little over $6,000 last year. And let's say you're a single woman with kids, 2-3 kids and you're a single mother. Not only do you get a $24,000 standard deduction, but you would also get $1,000 increase credit, which is refundable, against your payroll tax...per child! Per child. You know, if you're a single mother with two kids, you get an extra $2,000 right off the top! So, I don't really understand her math. Proft: Her math is WRONG, but I just want to advance the argument. Jacobson: "Math is hard..." Proft: No, but it...it...point of fact, minimum wage earners end up AHEAD in this because of what you just explained. But these are the arguments that are being put out, and oh by the way we were just having this discussion before you joined us, but GOP... Moore: My...my only question is, when someone writes something like that...are they just lying? Or are they ignorant of the bill? And don't they have fact checkers at the New York Times? Proft: Yeah, and...although, lying and being ignorant, not mutually exclusive...but here's the thing. 62-30, we've got a 32-point deficit, Republicans do, among college-educated women, and 20-point deficit generally. And this is gonna... Moore: Among women? Proft: Yeah, among women. Moore: Yeah. Proft: And this is something that's going to have to be addressed. Moore: It's a big problem! It is a BIG problem. When I walk down the street, I often get frowns from upscale women, who feel like Trump is some kind of demon. But you look...my feeling is about Donald Trump is pretty simple...don't look at what he says, don't pay attention to his tweets, just always pay attention to what he's doing. Take a look at the actions he's taking and the impact they're having on the economy and they're universally positive! I mean look, I don't like a lot of his tweets, I think sometimes he acts more. Yes, he exaggerates, "I WILL BE THE GREATEST PRESIDENT IN THE HISTORY OF THIS COUNTRY!" kind of thing. But you look at what he's done to rebuild the economy, rebuild the stock market, confidence is up everywhere I go, I talk to business men and women, they say "we're feeling good about 2018", so just ride...ride on this rising tide! Jacobson: But the sad thing is we live in this state where our Federal taxpayers...we're gonna have a cap on state and local tax deductions at $10,000, so...you should have SEEN the lines in DuPage County, Will County Treasurer's Office, Cook County...Cook County, normally $13 million prepaid, this year, it was $529 MILLION. That's what the total was, before the stroke of midnight. Moore: WOW. So you know what I find interesting about that...I'm glad you brought that up, Amy, because I just wrote my column this week on this whole (?), because the whole kind of...the liberal's philosophy on taxes is taxes don't really matter, right? They don't really affect people's behavior, they don't change their behavior based on a change in tax policy. Well, of course that's visibly wrong now! People are waiting in lines for hours and hours to prepay their property taxes, so they can shave a little bit off of what they're going to have to pay. Yes, taxes DO matter, they DO affect behavior. And people say "Well gee, if taxes will affect the behavior of people to prepay, why wouldn't lowering taxes on people when they work, when they start a business, when they save, why...when they invest...why wouldn't we believe that's gonna increase the amount of saving and investment and work that people do?" That's the whole philosophy behind this bill, is to bring money back from overseas, to make America more competitive. You know, the people that are really pissed off about this tax cut are...you know, you talked about some liberals that are pissed off, the real people that are really nervous about it are the Germans, and the Chinese, and the Mexicans, and all these other countries that have been stealing jobs from America...it's not gonna be so easy anymore, because our tax rates are now lower than theirs are! Proft: Yeah, and I mean, Illinois is kind of a special case, as you know, hailing from here, Steve. And people here, in terms of the political class, not understanding that people respond to incentives, they still can't figure out why Illinois yet again this year led the nation in outmigration. They think it has something to do with the balmier weather in Wisconsin. Moore: Well the uh...*laughs*...yeah, and the good schools down in West Virginia and that sort of thing! I think...this is my point, and I think it's a very serious point; Illinois now, now that we did limit the state and local tax deduction, Illinois really does have a choice now. I mean, you are going to have to cut your property taxes! There's no question about it. If you don't cut your property taxes at the state and local level in Illinois, that outmigration we've been talking about, Dan, of people moving out of Illinois to Wisconsin or Florida or Texas or even West Virginia or Kentucky, that outmigration is going to increase! And, and, then Illinois is...you think you're in a boatload of trouble NOW? Wait until you get more and more people who are taxpayers leave the state. You're going to have mountainous deficits unless something is done. And I mean, I don't know, do you think that they will respond in that way? Proft: No. Jacobson: No. Proft: No. Moore: Now I mean, I'm talking about the officials. Jacobson: Right. Moore: I'm talking about the elected officials. Do you think they will cut property taxes? Proft: No. No! Jacobson: No, they'll try to use this to say "President Trump is bad, Republicans are bad, vote Democratic." Proft: Yeah I mean...that is what they will... Moore: But I mean you...you already vote Democrat! Proft: Yeah, I know. Jacobson: Well, they're secure their base. Proft: Obviously, if there's not a change...this is something that the voters have to decide first, before the elected officials make that decision, because the balance of power in Illinois at this point? No, it won't happen. It won't happen. Moore: Well, I have an idea for you guys. Jacobson: Please. Help. Yes. Moore: And this is a very serious idea, it was in the New York Times. Do you know what they're talking about in New York and California now? Because they have sky-high income tax, you have sky-high property taxes. They want to...they are investigating if they can make the income taxes that they pay in New York and California, where the rate is 13.5%, charitable contributions. Proft: *laughs* Jacobson: Really? Moore: *laughing* Did you see that? Proft: Yeah. Yeah. Moore: *still laughing* So you could actually get a deduction, for writing a charitable contribution to the...so maybe people in Illinois will make a charitable contribution... Proft: Yeah! They'll make a charitable contribution of their HOME, here, because that's what's happening here. Let me ask you another question before we go, getting back to national policy. Ovie Croix had a good piece in the Wall Street Journal about Obamacare, and the Republicans, you know, can't avoid dealing with Obamacare in 2018...because of course, the repeal of the individual mandate. But he points out that the Trump executive order, reviving alternative forms of short-term health insurance, gives Americans an imperfect but real escape valve from Obamacare's costliest regulation. He suggests the focus should be, this year with respect to Obamacare, not dealing with the exchanges but doing something with respect to the Medicaid program, doing a version of Graham/Cassidy focused solely on Medicaid. Do you think that's where Republicans should spend their political capital? Moore: Yeah, I do. I mean, I love the idea of letting states experiment with how to control costs for health care under Medicaid. Basically what you would do under this kind of background is basically give a state like Illinois, or a state like Utah, or say any state...a pot of money, you know, that will cov...that is enough to cover the, you know, people who are qualified for Medicaid, but saying "Look, you spend this money in the way you think is the most efficient, will provide the best quality of care for your people, and this is all you got!" So, I'll show you, you go over this amount...and we've done this in several states, where states got waivers to experiment, and they found INCREDIBLE ways to save money. I'll just give you one example, I may have mentioned this on your show before, but it's just my favorite example. In Rhode Island, where they had a waiver where they got a block grant and said "You spend the money and spend it efficiently," they added a $20 co-pay. So any time someone went to an Emergency Room that was on Medicaid? They had to pay $20 out of pocket. You know how much their...how dramatically their Emergency Room visits went down? By 40%. Just by charging people $20, so it wasn't free to people. If you do those kinds of things, states will find incredible ways to save money. Now under...you could not devise a stupider system than Medicaid. Right now, when Illinois wastes a dollar on Medicaid payments, you get 90 cents from the Federal Government, and you pay 10 cents of it. So states like Illinois actually have an incentive to waste money on Medicaid. I mean, there are states that actually INTENTIONALLY waste money, so they can get more money from Washington. It's the craziest system. Proft: Yeah, well no, that's exactly it. Going back to your point before about incentives, and how people respond to them. He is Steve Moore, Wall Street Journal columnist, Senior Economist for CNN, economist at the Heritage Foundation. Steve, thanks as always for joining us, appreciate it. Moore: Alright, have a great week guys, Happy New Year! Proft: Happy New Year!

Related Content

Time For Weinstein Co. To Put Their Money Where Their Mouth Is

Who knew what and when about Kevin Spacey? Who kept quiet? Is there going to be a new shift in Hollywood from business as usual? Are the men in Hollywood being put on notice? Will Weinstein be welcomed back in the industry? Lawyer for Harvey Weinstein accusers, Gloria Allred joins Dan and Amy to discuss why Hollywood leftists hate women and children, as well as why her daughter defended The Human Stain.

Related Content

Men, Marriage, Monogamy, Oh My!

Is "Cheap Sex" making men abandon marriage? What are the long term cultural and economic consequences due to the decrease in marriages? Why do people say they want to get married but then it never actually happens? Are men more content with being basement dwellers in their parents’ home than getting married? Is there a link to the cultural notion that fathers are not needed? Should men be prepared to start getting proposals from women? Are men afraid of commitment? Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of Texas at Austin and author of “Cheap Sex: The Transformation of Men, Marriage and Monogamy,” Mark Regnerus joins Dan and Amy to discuss.

Related Content

Lives Worth Choosing

For the past nine years in Iceland, every child diagnosed with Down Syndrome in utero was aborted for that reason. Where does the Pro-Choice community draw the line? See if you can Follow the Logic.

Related Content

Things Not Yet Seen

By, Kathleen Murphy

“Faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.”  – Hebrews 11:1

In 1837, a coalition of women who had created local, female abolitionist societies came together in New York, forming the Anti-Slavery Convention of American Women. It was the first national political women’s meeting in American history. Both black and white women met and began to break the taboo of speaking in public and petitioning in the political arena. Calling their work “the cause of God,” this courageous band of 180 women saw themselves on a mission to unite Heaven and Earth, in the form of a society that would live the democratic and religious ideals it espoused.

The response to the meeting was outrage. At the next convention, a mob of 10,000 surrounded the building throwing stones at it, and eventually lighting it on fire. The demoralizing reaction seemed only to galvanize these pioneers.

With deepened resolve, the women continued to meet. In 1848, five religious women, including Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott, a Quaker Minister, would meet in Seneca Falls, New York for the infamous tea party during which they would plot a revolution.  

These women were both revolutionaries and visionaries who had their eyes on a truth that transcended man-made religious or governmental law.

By contrast, modern feminism has grown in opposition to religious authority, becoming a totally secular movement. In January, feminist organizers of a Women’s March even banned Pro-Life women from sponsoring the march. This is just one very prominent manifestation of the resistance the modern Women’s Movement has to religion and religious women.

Faith, generally, is based on a connectedness to a higher power. While I understand that organized religions have often been fierce opponents to women’s social and political equality, I consider it an enormous loss to separate the women’s movement from faith entirely.  As Helen LaKelly Hunt, Ph.D, author of Faith and Feminism: A Holy Alliance writes, “the crimes of any religious institution do not negate the value of universal love and the religious ideals at its core. Sadly, human institutions will always be flawed reflections of the values they hope to embody.” Hunt goes on to explain that women’s groups – and I would add, most political organizations and movements – fall short of their stated values and ideals, as well.

In 2017, the feminist movement seems to have been commandeered by those on the partisan Left, who find it politically effective to create division instead of healing. They advance a depressing view of women as helpless, isolated wards of the state, who always benefit when government grows and assumes power, and always suffer when government frees them to make their own decisions.

In a recent interview with The Guardian, Women’s March organizers reveal the goals of the movement include not only an end to “male violence,” and protection of “reproductive rights” (by which they mean the right to have a taxpayer-funded abortion), but also “anti-capitalist” feminism.

This interpretation of feminism seems a far cry from the faith-fueled activism that was aimed at healing a broken and disconnected culture. The religious energy of women such as Stanton, Mott, Susan B. Anthony, St. Joan of Arc, St. Theresa of Avila, Sojourner Truth, Harriett Tubman, and Dorothy Day was grounded in the conviction that their calling was an extension of divine order and virtue. That connection to spirit is absent in the modern feminist movement.

Personally, I believe the feminist movement’s goal of protecting women from violence or discrimination is noble and important. Yet, I find the movement’s secular, almost atheistic sentiments run in contrast to both my beliefs and my experiences.

On a dark night in 2011, I found myself moving back into my parent’s house, a single mother of two young children, clothes and toys in trash bags, $100 in cash and a part-time job. I was no one. And, I had nothing to my name. I was strengthened by family and faith. It was often a struggle, but I chose to believe that there was a plan for me and that it was good. I took each step – big and small – that appeared on my path. Despite mistakes and missteps, I have moved out of that dark night. Not only would it be wholly disingenuous for me to ignore God’s hand in my life, it would be an act of tremendous ingratitude.

I have known the protection and power that comes through my faith. I want my daughter – and my son – to know it, as well. I want to create a world for my daughter in which she will hold equal standing with her male contemporaries, be cherished by her husband, and valued as much as her male colleagues. I cannot, however, be a part of a movement that ridicules her belief in the source of connectedness and love that we understand as God.

Is it possible to reconcile Faith and Feminism?

The two strike me as manifestations of the same yearning. I am Catholic. While I have great esteem for the accomplishments of other faiths, we speak most authentically from personal experience. So, I use the example of Christianity.

The inception of both Christianity and Feminism did more than just pose a few new ideas to a dominant world view. They shook things up until a new social order emerged. In their pure form, both are revolutions of consciousness; both challenge comfortable beliefs; both seek to enlarge our capacity for empathy; and both demand deep and critical thought.

Today, we are in need of a new social transformation that strengthens the work of feminist revolutionaries. If we resist the opportunity to form this unique and truly inclusive relationship, we do no better than those who uphold fixed models of division and antagonism.

It is time to renew the call for an intentional dialogue between people of faith and the feminist movement. Both sides call for connection, compassion and advancement. Yet in cutting the other off, both fall short in their mission. If political or religious leaders will not take up this call, then, as Mother Teresa recommended, “Do not wait for leaders. Do it alone, person to person.” After all, just look at all that was created by five women at a tea party in 1848.



LaKelly-Hunt, Helen Ph.D. Faith and Feminism: A Holy Alliance. Atria Books, 2004.

Related Content

The End Of Gender?

Dan and Amy speak with author Ashley McGuire about her book, "Sex Scandal: The Drive to Abolish Male and Female" and the effort by the Hollywood Left and other purveyors of pop culture to normalize feelings about gender over biology. As this mentality negatively impacts women in sports and women's safety on college campuses, will there be a revolt?

Related Content

Progressive Exclusion

Feminist groups excluded thousands of women who might have joined the recent Women's March because of their Pro-Life values. So, what criteria must be met in order to be included? We went to a protest at Trump Tower to see if we could Follow Feminist Logic.  

Related Content