`

kim jong un

Friendly Relations With North Korea

Are the tensions between America and North Korea decreasing due to the relationship between the nation’s leaders? Could this lead to North Korea disbanding their nuclear interests making them less of a threat to the rest of the world? Former Pentagon official, Jed Babbin joins Dan and Amy to discuss possible outcomes for the future of our countries’ relationship.

Related Content

The Art Of No Deal

Did Trump make the right move by walking on North Korea? Does it give him any leverage with the Chinese? How do you reason with an irrational person? Was there any expectation in Southeast Asia that something would happen? What is Russia’s role in North Korea? Contributor at Washington Times, Jed Babbin joins Dan and Amy to discuss.

Related Content

The Last Supper

What are the possible outcomes from the Trump/ Kim Jong Un meeting? Will it be their last? How important are South Korea and Japan in the effort to denuclearize in North Korea? LT. Col. James Carafano from the Heritage Foundation joins Dan and Amy to discuss.

Related Content

The Green Dream

Is the Green New Deal so far out there that even Pelosi termed it the “Green Dream?” Hasn’t the American experiment proved that people don’t need the government to prosper? What advice should POTUS take in advance of his next meeting with Kim Jong-Un? With the U.S. withdrawing from Syria in the spring, who is going to fill the void? Former Michigan Congressman and House Intel Committee Chairman, Mike Rogers joins Dan and Amy to discuss.  

Related Content

The Left’s Emotional Manipulation

Is Trump’s overly simplistic video shown to Kim Jong Un going to be effective? Are the problems with families at the border a showing of how ineffective government has been on immigration laws?  Is the Trump administration overplaying its hand with it's "zero tolerance" policy on immigration pending reforms? Trump Whisperer and Dilbert cartoon creator, Scott Adams joins Dan and Amy to discuss.

Related Content

Lawless And Corrupt Obama Administration

Are the criticisms of Trump conceding too much or being too complimentary to Kim Jong Un fair? Is anyone in the FBI going to be held accountable after their bias and culture of corruption has been brought to light? Has the Obama administration proven to be the most lawless and intellectually corrupt that we’ve seen in American history? Former U.S. Deputy Undersecretary of Defense, Jed Babbin joins Dan and Kristen to discuss.

Related Content

Obamacare In A Death Spiral

Did Trump propose Kudlow’s idea of ending all tariffs for a truly free trade market? Is it too late to dial back the government’s control over your healthcare as Obamacare premiums could spike as high as 80%? Is Trump’s interactions with Kim Jong Un a PR stunt or is there a truly budding relationship between the two? Chief Economist for CNN, Steve Moore joins Dan and Amy to discuss.

Related Content

Trump’s Confidence In North Korea

How much do the North Korean people know about the summit between Kim and Trump? Should Trump tone down the rhetoric for his respect for the ruthless dictatorship of Kim? Is China the elephant in the room in peace talks? As experts dig deeper into the Iran Deal (not the DC Press Corps) are they finding out more and more lies propagated from the Obama Administration? Resident Scholar for AEI, Michael Rubin joins Dan and Amy to discuss.

Related Content

China Playing A Tougher Game With North Korea

What’s different about North Korea now compared to when they promised to denuclearize numerous times before? Is China going to interfere no matter what happens after the summit? Will Trump’s timeshare condo video convince Kim Jong Un to make peace? Former Supreme Allied Commander of NATO, Admiral James Stavridis joins Dan and Amy to discuss.

Related Content

Will Trump Concede To Kim Jong Un?

Do the majority of Americans support the summit between the U.S. and North Korea? Is Trump willing to do anything to make this successful and declare a victory? Or does Kim Jong Un need it more? Andy McCabe faces more bad news since admitting he leaked classified information and after the recent indictment of a Senate Intel staffer for leaking. National Review Editor, Rich Lowry joins Dan and Amy to discuss.

Related Content

On Again/Off Again Relationship With North Korea

The U.S. is refusing economic aid for North Korea until they denuclearize, but is China interfering in that proposition? Is Kim Jong Un’s stock rising due to his possible meeting with the most important leader in the free world? What are the dangers and possible concessions for the U.S. in their summit with North Korea? Senior Editor for the Washington Free Beacon Bill Gertz joins Dan and Amy to discuss.

Related Content

Time Out Between U.S. And North Korea

Trump left Rocket Man at the altar. Was Trump right to cancel the meeting or was he ill-advised to agree in the first place? Does Trump's understanding of human nature inform his foreign policy? National Security Expert, Colonel Cedric Leighton joins Dan and Amy to discuss. 

Related Content

Trump Changing The Dynamic With North Korea

Did Trump impose tariffs with the Pennsylvania special election in the back of his mind? Right now, Canada and Mexico are exempt but how is the EU fighting back? Will Trump have to give “Rocket Man” a new nickname if talks with North Korea lead to denuclearization? Anchor of Special Report on Fox News, Bret Baier joins Dan and Amy to discuss.

Related Content

North Korea’s New Olive Branch

Should we believe the latest overture by North Korea through South Korea that Kim Jong-un is open to disbanding his nuclear weapons program? Has the DC press corps’ love affair with Kim Jong Un’s sister made them forget the last 25 years of North Korean propaganda? Former US Ambassador to the UN, John Bolton joins Dan and Amy to discuss.

View full transcript


Proft: Good morning, Dan and Amy. We're coming to you from Charles Equipment Energy Systems, our friends here in Des Plaines, part of our AM560/Signature Bank Business Tour, and it's always fun to be here. They're in the business of providing energy solutions, big-time energy solutions. They've been responsive in hurricanes, for example, where the power is out, they're the ones who bring the huge generators down to... Jacobson: Yeah, they have generators the size of semi trucks that they bring down to help people...well, to give them electricity, so that they can clean up the area, and eat, and just...survive. Proft: So, we're talking about big energy solutions here, and we'll be talking to the gentlemen who operate this company...one of whom is an excellent cook. Jacobson: Oh yeah, Mike? You can say his name, man. Proft: And he's a bit of a character, too. We'll be talking to him at the bottom of the 7 o'clock hour so you want to stay tuned for that. Yesterday, Jeanne Ives...so we talked about this show, both with Jeanne Ives and Alderman Napolitano, Anthony Napolitano of the 41st Ward, far Northwest side there, the Edison Park area. They held a joint press conference yesterday to talk about that City Key ID that has made national news, we've talked about it on this show, when your Alderman, Amy, Ameya Pawar was on Tucker Carlson, and got his lunch handed to him? (Jacobson: Oh yeah, oh yeah, oh yeah.) So, Jeanne Ives and Napolitano doing a joint presser in their shared interest to not allow this ID that "Tiny Dancer" has concocted to be used as a form of identification for the purposes of voter registration for people who are in this country illegally. Jacobson: That's ALL it's used for. On the...Ameya Pawar said "Well, then I could take the train with it too." Well, what does that mean? No, you need a Venture card to take the train. Proft: Well, the point is if you want to use this new ID card to check out a library book or to get a Venture card, FINE. The only issue, and this was finely tailored, the legislation that Ives has filed, is it cannot be used for voter registration, cannot be used for voter registration. And we'll pick up that discussion in a little bit, but here right now we have our friend Ambassador John Bolton joining us. John Bolton, former United States Ambassador to the UN joins us now, and the timing couldn't be better because there's some breaking news. The New York Times reporting that Kim Jong-un saying that North Korea is willing to start talks with the US on giving up its nuclear weapons according to South Korea, per their little confab in Pyongyang... Jacobson: Pyongchang...PF Chang's... Proft: Pyeongchang in North Korea. Not ABC News version. Recently, and so let's get more insight on that from Ambassador Bolton, thanks for joining us Ambassador Bolton, appreciate it. Bolton: Well, glad to be with you, thanks for having me. Proft: So, do you...how much stock do you put in this New York Times report about what the South Koreans are saying, or is this just Kim Jong-un trying to manipulate and propagandize? Bolton: Look, this is the umptiumpth offer by North Korea to talk about giving up their nuclear weapons, we've been doing this for 25 years. The North Koreans have pledged in written international agreements four times during that period to give up nuclear weapons, they've lied about it every time. So I'd like to say, when you've tried something for 25 years and failed, what makes you think in year 26 it's going to be any different? Now, why are the North Koreans doing it now? I think precisely because they are so close, after 25 years of trying, to being able to deliver nuclear weapons on target in the United States. CIA director Mike Pompeo said a few weeks ago that he thought that they could master all the complexities that were necessary to do that "within a handful of months", HIS phrase, "a handful of months". So I think talking now, talking about a freeze on testing and,you know, maybe just freeze the American and South Korean military maneuvers that were postponed because of the Olympics and we'll just talk about it, and at the end of six months, the North Koreans will have deliverable nuclear weapons if we fall for it. Jacobson: So you think this is all just a cat-and-mouse game? Bolton: Yeah, I think this is all just a little diversion. "Isn't it exciting to talk to North Korea?" Honestly, it's when you've talked to them so many times in the last 25 years that it's hard to keep count, again somebody has to provide some compelling evidence of why talking to them now will make a difference. And what I fear is that next people say "What an amazing breakthrough!" as if they've forgotten the last 25 years of history, the news media are very good at that, they have short attention spans. But people say "Well, we have to help create the proper atmosphere, and we need to prime the pump a little bit, and we need to show good faith." All of which is code language for "make some concessions". Which the North Koreans would happily put in their pocket, as they have since going back to the Korean War Armistice negotiations in 1953, that's the way they negotiate. So, the Trump Administration has said previously they are happy to talk to North Korea, but we won't let up any of the pressure on North Korea. I think that's the absolute minimum, the pressure needs to be increased as they get closer to achieving their objective but I have no doubt that in parts of the State Department they're breaking out the champagne saying "Great! Let's head to Beijing for more talks and let's keep the party going!" That's a way of GUARANTEEING that North Korea gets deliverable nuclear weapons, which by the way they will be HAPPY to sell to anybody with the right amount of money. Proft: And also, too...I mean a part of this is the DC Press Corps' love affair with Kim Jong-un's sister, the Gold medalist in diplomacy at the Pyeongchang Games according to the DC Press Corps, his propaganda minister and sister. And I just wonder if North Korea is seizing on all of that goodwill foisted upon North Korea through his sister to then bring the South Koreans in, and make it look like there's some reproach ma (?), and as you say the entire thing, including as it pertains to South Korea, is diversionary. Bolton: Yeah, as we saw, there's a new diplomatic first here. Kim Jong-un met with representatives of South Korea. Well, big deal! His father met with representatives of South Korea on more occasions, I think, than we can count. We know that South Korea funded North Korea's participation in the Olympic Games, it's another way...the North Koreans are the best grifters and tadgers...I mean they make Wimpy and his offer, you know "How about a hamburger today, and I'll pay you tomorrow?", they make him look like a piker. And there's just more of this coming, you can see it. It's very...it's very dangerous, and nobody should be deceived by it, but I'm sure the usual suspects will be deceived by it. Jacobson: Well, besides talking, they also set up a hotline where they can talk, you know President Moon and Kim Jong-un, they can speak freely and directly to each other. And then there's this April summit, that's going to be held, you know, on the South Korean side of the Demilitarized Zone that divides the two countries. And do you think President Trump will soon get involved in this? Do you think there will actually ever be talks between Kim Jong-un and President Trump? Bolton: Well, I don't think there SHOULD be. Because I think simply the presence of the American president in the same room as Kim Jong-un gives him legitimacy that is beyond calculation and value. I really think this whole thing is just to tap for our attention while they're putting the last touches on their ballistic missiles and their thermonuclear warheads, as I said, Mike Pompeo thinks it will only take a handful of months. I don't know EXACTLY what that means, of course, but it sounds like before the end of this year, absent sabotage or other steps that might slow it down. So you know, it's just hard to credit that after 25 years or so of trying, the North Koreans have come within a handful of months, and then decided to say "Oh you know, we weren't THAT serious. We're prepared to give it up right now!" It's just...it doesn't wash, but there are lots of people looking for bridges to buy on the cheap, and I'm sure we're gonna hear from them in the next few days. Proft: I want to get your take on some of the developments in the whole Bob Mueller Special Counsel investigation, Russian collusion, and everything under that umbrella. Not just Sam Nunberg's bizarre day on the cable TV news networks, but also this story about the Australian diplomat that provided the FBI with the information that launched the FBI's Russia probe. The infamous conversation over cocktails with George Papadopoulus, this guy Alexander Downer, who's now the Australian ambassador to London...he also... Bolton: Right. I know Alexander Downer. He is a friend to the United States, whether he was a member of (?)...the administration, the conservative administration in the early part of the Bush administration. But whether he wholly understood what he was doing, whether it was others in the Australian government that really moved this along, I don't know. But yeah, it's really just another example of the reach of the Clinton Foundation, and why we're still looking at the tip of the iceberg here in terms of the information you have on so many of these fronts. So yeah, there's more here to look at, there's no doubt about that. Proft: Yeah, I mean you're talking about a $25M donation, that he apparently helped arrange, from Australia to the Clinton Foundation to support screening and medication to AIDS patients in Asia, that was back in 2006, but it's still something to kind of factor in, kind of in the interest of full disclosure and context. And I also wonder about what you...how you interpreted what Intel Chairman Nunes said the other day, that the person who was sharing or getting information from Russia was the...or the organization was the Clinton campaign. Bolton: Yeah, this is obviously tied to Nunes and (?). I've seen information that's not public, and I think it's entirely consistent with the argument that many in the Intelligence community have made, that the Russians were trying to sow distrust and erode faith in our public institutions, and even Mueller's indictment, that's only a piece of the puzzle, that's for sure. But, it tells that the Russians were prepared to help all kinds of candidates, even Bernie Sanders, and...the Green Party candidate, in an effort I think to cause confusion in the American electorate. So if they thought they could attract the Clinton campaign, I have no doubt they'd be prepared to try. There was certainly no principle reason for them not to. Proft: He is John Bolton, the former United States Ambassador to the UN. Ambassador Bolton, thanks as always for joining us, appreciate your time. Bolton: Thanks again for having me.

Related Content

The DC Press Corps & Dictators

“North Korea heads for diplomacy gold medal at Olympics,” was the Reuters headline.

“Kim Jong-un’s sister is stealing the show at the Olympics,” CNN reported breathlessly.

This is the same DC press corps that comes apart at the seams in response to the slightest of provocative tweets or bellicose rhetoric from Trump.

Could the press be even more attention-starved than the President?

Or is the glowing review of North Korea’s chief propagandist just professional courtesy from our chief propagandists?

The only other option is that our big government press corps is genuine in their appreciation.

It wouldn’t be the DC press corps’ first dalliance with a dictator.

The New York Times didn’t believe Hitler was sincere in his anti-Semitism. They spent the run-up to the Third Reich profiling Hitler as a Bavarian gentleman who enjoyed “strolls with his three sheep dogs along majestic mountain trails.”

The New Republic was similarly enthralled with the Bolshevik Revolution that brought Stalin to power remarking upon Stalin’s “energy” and “positiveness”.

When both Trump and the DC press corps were recently given the opportunity to honor someone on the international stage, Trump chose Otto Warmbier. The DC press corps chose the regime that murdered him.

Instructive.

RELATED CONTENT

Cold War Era Sirens In Hawaii After North Korean Missile Launch

Are our options limited or are we staying the course with extra sanctions and UN Security Council meetings in regards to North Korea’s latest missile launch? Are Russia and China willing to step up to the table? Should the focus be on missile defense? Former Joint Chiefs of Staff and National Security Council member, Colonel Cedric Leighton joins Dan and Amy to discuss.

Related Content

Are The North Korean Threats As Serious As We Think?

“Let’s build so much missile defense that the bar is so high that the North Koreans can never dream in their lifetimes of ever actually having a credible threat that they could reach the United States.” Should Kim Jong-un's quarterly missile test change U.S. strategy? Does it change the geopolitical dynamics with our South Korean and Japanese allies? Vice President of Foreign Policy and National Security at The Heritage Foundation, James Carafano joins Dan and Amy to discuss.

Related Content

Trump On Venezuelan Socialism: Not Poorly But Faithfully Implemented

Is there a false choice between the idea of sovereignty and working multilaterally? Is the US getting their money’s worth out of the UN? What could be done to reform the UN to eliminate the corruption and mismanagement? Will Kim Jong Un seriously heed Trump’s warning? What’s wrong with “America first?” Don’t all countries put their people first? President of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, Cliff May joins Dan and Amy to discuss.

Related Content

Babbin: “Nothing Is Going To Slow North Korea Down”

“This is different from just extorting money. Kim Jong Un is trying to deter us from intervening in his plans.” Are our missile defense systems up to par? Are the UN sanctions having any effect against North Korea? Former Pentagon official and Washington Times columnist, Jed Babbin joins Dan and Amy to discuss.

Related Content

McCain Hasn't Been Correct On Foreign Policy In 30 Years

Is Trump’s language of “fire and fury” out of line? Are we in greater danger due to the neglect of past Presidents? What is China’s role and are they too afraid to admit they have lost control in their relationship with Kim Jong? Is President Trump surrounding himself with the right people? Jed Babbin thinks no. The former US Deputy Undersecretary of Defense, Jed Babbin joins Dan and Amy to discuss.

RELATED CONTENT