`

markjanus

The Impact of Janus v. AFSCME

The recent Supreme Court ruling in Janus v. AFSCME, a case that tested the constitutionality of public sector union fees, was a victory for worker freedom. In 22 states - including Illinois - state workers had been forced to fund a union they didn't want to belong to. Janus v. AFSCME has changed that. What does that mean for Illinois? Liberty Justice Center Vice President Diana Rickert and State Representative Margo McDermed (R-Frankfort) join Host Jodi Carroll to get to The Heart of the Matter.

RELATED CONTENT

The Logic Of The Anti-Choice Left

 

Many on the political left - who claim to support a woman's right to choose - are outraged over the recent SCOTUS decision in Janus v. AFSCME. The ruling gave women (and men) who work for the state the right to choose whether or not they associate with a labor union. So, what's the problem? Do Chicagoans Follow the Left's Logic? 

RELATED CONTENT

Dan & Amy Interview Mark Janus on his Chicago Tribune Article, "Why I Don't Want To Pay Union Dues"

Mark Janus likes working for the State of Illinois at the Department Healthcare and Family Services. But he doesn't like being forced to be a member of AFSCME. And he's talking his case to the U.S. Supreme Court which will hear oral arguments on the matter next week. He joined Dan Proft and Amy Jacobson on Chicago's Morning Answer for a conversation on topic.

related content